U.S. Supreme Court justices were questioned, cleared in leak probe
The U.S. Supreme Court’s chief security officer on Friday said she spoke with each of the justices in her inquiry into who leaked a draft of its ruling overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that had legalized abortion nationwide, adding that the probe found no information implicating them or their spouses.
John Kruzel The U.Jonathan Turley weighs in on the U.Rep.A press release issued Friday said that Dunleavy selected Pate from a list of candidates nominated by the Alaska Judicial Council.
S.Supreme Court building is seen in Washington, U.Supreme Court’s statement that the leaker of the draft of the ruling on Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization has still not been found on ‘America Reports.S.Michigan progressive Democrat Rashida Tlaib attacked the as”extremist” as it considers a union striking case and called to”expand the court., June 27, 2022.The report, released by the U.REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo WASHINGTON, Jan 20 (Reuters) – The U.According to the court system website, Pate served as counsel for the Sitka Tribe of Alaska for five years until 1999 and had a private practice for seven years until 2006.
S.Supreme Court Marshal on Thursday, states that an investigative team hasn’t been able to”identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence” who leaked the Dobbs v.Rep.Supreme Court’s chief security officer on Friday said she spoke with each of the justices in her inquiry into who leaked a draft of its ruling overturning the 1973 Roe v.Wade decision that had legalized abortion nationwide, adding that the found no information implicating them or their spouses.George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley said on Twitter that the court’s inability to find the leaker is”chilling.Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley made the statement a day after the court released a 20-page report based on the eight-month investigation she led that failed to identify who leaked the draft to the news organization Politico.”Expand the Court,” she added.The report said investigators interviewed 97 court employees but was silent on whether the nine justices who sat on the court at the time of the leak were interviewed, prompting calls from Democratic lawmakers and others for clarity.It is an admission that is almost as chilling as the leak itself,” Turley said.
“During the course of the investigation, I spoke with each of the justices, several on multiple occasions,” Curley said in the statement, released by the court.”The justices actively cooperated in this iterative process, asking questions and answering mine.S.Oral arguments in the case were heard last week.” “I followed up on all credible leads, none of which implicated the justices or their spouses,” Curley added.Curley said on that basis she decided it was not necessary to ask the justices to sign sworn affidavits affirming they did not leak the draft, something court employees were required to do.Jackson Women’s Health Organization case.The court’s membership differed last May from today, with now-retired Justice Stephen Breyer still on the bench and current Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, his successor appointed by President Joe Biden, not yet sworn in., for its 50th anniversary – and the first march since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v.
Conservative activists have sought to raise suspicions that one of the liberal justices or a staffer for them was responsible for the leak, just as liberal activists have sought to blame conservative justices or their staffers.Scott Applewhite, File) “It will likely revive concerns over whether the FBI should have been asked to take the lead on the investigation.Gabe Roth, executive director of the court reform group Fix the Court, said the fact that the report initially omitted the fact that the justices were interviewed “smells fishy.” “That they were not asked to sign affidavits smells fishier,” Roth added.What is clear is that any hope for a deterrent on such unethical conduct has been dramatically reduced.(Getty Images) The first March for Life took place in Washington, D.The leak represented an unprecedented violation of the court’s tradition of confidentiality in the behind-the-scenes process of making rulings after hearing oral arguments in cases.Mark Zaid, a Washington-based lawyer known for representing government whistleblowers, criticized the decision not to require sworn affidavits from the justices or their spouses, saying the court’s credibility is on the line with the leak.” Sen.
“Because the marshal could not even identify the leaker based on a low-level preponderance-of-evidence standard, it raises the question – at least from an appearance standpoint – as to whether a justice played a role in the leak, and that scenario remains unaddressed,” Zaid said.The Supreme Court overturned Roe last year in Dobbs v.Chief Justice John Roberts directed Curley to investigate after Politico last May published a draft of the opinion authored by Justice Samuel Alito in the case Dobbs v.”It’s deeply troubling that the Dobbs leaker still has not been found.Jackson Women’s Health Organization.The ruling was formally issued in June.”The leaker must to be brought to justice!” Sen.Complete bans on abortion have been enacted in 13 states.Alito found himself in the middle of another leak controversy in November after the New York Times reported a former anti-abortion leader’s assertion that he was told in advance about how the court would rule in a major 2014 case involving insurance coverage for women’s birth control.
Rob Schenck, an evangelical Christian minister, told the Times and later a congressional panel that weeks before the ruling was issued he was informed about its contents shortly after two conservative allies of his dined at the home of Alito and his wife.(Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images) Sen.Alito has said that any allegation that he or his wife leaked the 2014 decision was “completely false.Politicians set to speak include House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La.” Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Will Dunham Our Standards:., also reacted to the report, saying that someone needs to resign.
Read more:
Reuters » {{PageTitle}}
Loading news…
Failed to load news.
Supreme Court leak: Conservatives react to court’s inability to find leaker in historic abortion rulingConservatives are reacting a report by the Supreme Court outlining that it has been unable to find out who leaked a draft opinion in the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization case. That’s not the Supreme Court, that’s a Roman forum. The Supreme Court is in the United States. Why is Fox News allowing Blackrock advertise on their network?
Rashida Tlaib attacks Supreme Court as ‘extremist’ amid union case, calls to ‘expand the court’Squad member Rep. Rashida Tlaib attacked the Supreme Court on Friday, claiming a union’s ‘right to strike’ is ‘on trial’ as the court weighs in on a union strike case. She and her Squad buds don’t like they can’t get what they want. They feel they are entitled for being Marxist,Socialist Liberals. They will not listen but y’all better agree with them or else. Rep Tlaib needs to be held accountable for comments on the Supreme Court
Sitka judge appointed to Alaska Supreme CourtPate will fill the vacant seat left by current Alaska Supreme Court Chief Justice Daniel Winfree, who is retiring.
Supreme Court probe fails to find who leaked abortion rulingThe Supreme Court since last year has tried to identify who leaked a ruling overturning Roe v. Wade, which established a right to abortion. It was one or both Thomases or Alito or possibly one of their staffers. Even if it was a staffer, no doubt the justice involved knew it was happening. The Corrupt Court is a joke.
Supreme Court Probe Fails to Find Roe LeakerA nine-month investigation of who leaked the Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade decision was inconclusive, according to the court. See the potential biases and similarities in reports from SCOTUSblog, dcexaminer and nbcnews:
Supreme Court justices weren’t questioned under oath in leak probeNEW: Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley says she uncovered no leads in the Dobbs leak probe that implicated the justices and therefore did not question any of them under oath. She does say, however, that they were active and cooperative participants. Hell of a way to conduct an investigation… Bull Sh*t. We all know that they know exactly who leaked it. A professional wrestling referee could have done a better job than her.
{{PageTitle}}
Loading news…
Failed to load news.
{{PageTitle}}
Loading news…
Failed to load news.
