Supreme Court marshal says justices were part of investigation, but didn’t sign sworn affidavits

Spread the love



Supreme Court marshal says justices were part of investigation, but didn’t sign sworn affidavits

Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley said in a statement that justices were part of the investigation into who leaked the draft opinion for Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

‘Fox News Sunday’ host Shannon Bream joins ‘America Reports’ with the latest details on the investigation.Follow Us.Chief Justice John Roberts tasked Curley to head up the unprecedented leak after a May 2 Politico report posted an authentic draft of the Dobbs v.Follow Us.

Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley said that justices were part of the investigation into who leaked a draft opinion to Politico last year.”During the course of the investigation, I spoke with each of the Justices, several on multiple occasions.The Justices actively cooperated in this iterative process, asking questions and answering mine.”The Justices actively cooperated in this iterative process, asking questions and answering mine.I followed up on all credible leads, none of which implicated the Justices or their spouses.On this basis, I did not believe that it was necessary to ask the Justices to sign sworn affidavits,” Curley said in a statement on Friday.

Curley’s statement comes one day after the Supreme Court Marshal released a report stating that an investigative team hasn’t been able to”identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence” who leaked the Dobbs v.CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER After nine months of investigation, the high court released its 20-page report on Thursday with details about its procedures.Jackson Women’s Health Organization draft opinion.A police officer patrols in front of of the U.S..Supreme Court in Washington, D.

C.(Emily Elconin/Bloomberg via Getty Images) The report didn’t mention whether investigators spoke with the justices.Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more Fox News politics content.Arrives.

Read more:
Fox News » {{PageTitle}}

Loading news…

Failed to load news.

Although they are the highest court in the land they are still not above the law. Why not?

After eight months of investigation, Supreme Court marshal says culprit who leaked opinion not foundThe Supreme Court has come up empty in its search for how a draft opinion on last year’s highly charged abortion-rights case leaked to the media weeks before it was issued. Then it will happen again and the leakers go the result they wanted The Supreme Court WON’T identify the leaker. There, I fixed it for you.

Supreme Court justices were interviewed and not implicated in leak: MarshalSupreme Court Marshal Gail A. Curley, tasked to investigate the draft opinion leak signaling the overturning of Roe v. Wade, released a statement on Friday saying the justices were interviewed as part of the investigation but were not implicated in the leak. But then, the three most likely suspects all lied under oath during their nomination process, so 🤷‍♂️

Supreme Court marshal says justices, spouses weren’t responsible for leak of abortion rulingSupreme Court justices cooperated in the investigation of who leaked a draft opinion to the news media last year and were cleared as potential perpetrators, said Supreme Court Marshal Gail A. Curley. It wasn’t a justice because that would be below their dignity. It wasn’t a clerk because they all were asked and signed affidavits that they didn’t do it. It wasn’t anyone’s spouses. So, I guess nobody did it. 🙄

Marshal says Supreme Court justices questioned in leak probe, not implicatedNone of the Supreme Court justices nor their spouses were implicated in the investigation of the leaked draft opinion that overturned Roe v. Wade— but unlike court employees who were questioned, they were not asked to sign affidavits. Lol 🤣 yeah, ooookay. Everyone should have signed affidavits, even the Justices.

Justices interviewed as part of leak probe, Supreme Court marshal saysThe marshal of the Supreme Court on Friday said she spoke with each of the justices, who cooperated in the investigation, but she didn’t believe it was necessary to ask the justices to sign sworn affidavits.

Supreme Court ‘unable to identify’ person who leaked abortion decision overturning RoeBREAKING: The Supreme Court says it’s unable to identify the person who leaked the draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade. Pathetic SCOTUS knows who leaked just don’t wanna make it public Yeah, I’m not believing that

{{PageTitle}}

Loading news…

Failed to load news.

{{PageTitle}}

Loading news…

Failed to load news.



Source link